Papers with a current ascendance assessment.
Public method · Formula wf04.ascendance.v1
A journal can open the door. Attention can trigger a closer look. Neither can publish a dossier. Hadox keeps detection, scientific reading and editorial judgment as separate gates.
See the public comparisonThe current state is published instead of being smoothed away. A missing velocity is not a zero, and an editorial choice is not relabelled as an algorithmic breakout.
Papers with a current ascendance assessment.
Enough history to calculate the composite momentum signal.
Age × article type × discipline comparison sets.
The composite is calculated only after at least two usable intervals spanning 14 days. Missing components contribute zero; their weight is never redistributed to make a paper look stronger.
Change in citations divided by the real elapsed time, compared with fair peers.
Whether velocity itself is increasing. This needs three observation points.
Current citation position among papers of similar age, type and discipline.
Whether positive movement survives across usable intervals rather than appearing once.
A field-normalised citation signal such as the provider percentile.
BaselineOne point or no usable interval. No momentum score.
Provisional / watchOne interval or an insufficient cohort. The ceiling remains watch.
AssessableTwo intervals, at least 14 days and a usable cohort. Full states become available.
Citations, normalised impact, open-access and retraction signals are compared by age, field and paper type.
A stable version, authorised full body and localisable evidence are mandatory. Abstract-only records cannot enter.
Question, design, methods, claims, numbers, limits and transparency remain connected to exact evidence hashes.
knowledge_ready creates eligibility. A human review separately decides whether the science deserves public attention.
Provider coverage changes. The observatory names absent signal families so the audience can judge the limits of the ranking.